한국촌 상단 로고

싱가포르 최대의 한인정보 사이트! 우리 따뜻한 한인사회를 만들어 봐요!

통합검색

지식Q&A

  • ~
  • [질문]
  • 미답변
  • 기타
  • 부동산 Agent Fee-Removal of IEAs Commission Guideline
  • johnny (firstpak)
  • 질문 : 4건
  • 질문마감률 : 0%
  • 2008-10-06 12:22
  • 답글 : 0
  • 댓글 : 0
  • 1,053
  • 35
안녕하십니까? 부동산을 신규로 임대,구매를 할 경우 기존의 Agent Fee의,Guideline이 IEA(Institute Of Estate Agent) 없어지고, Agent와 구매자간에 사전에 협의를 하고, 진행의뢰를 해야만 될 것 같아 올리오니 참조하시기 바랍니다. PRESS RELEASE Tuesday, 5th August 2008 Removal of IEAs Commission Guidelines Moving forward IEA will remove IEA’s guidelines in September 2008 and paving the way for industry players and real estate agencies to set their own commission guidelines. On 18th July 2007, IEA submitted the IEA’s “Professional Fee/Commission for Real Estate Agents/Agencies.” to the Competition Commission of Singapore (CCS) seeking the  Commission’s guidance, pursuant to Section 43 of the Competition Act (Cap 50B) on the  Notification and Application if it infringes Section 34 of the Competition Act  ( Cap. 50B ), which  prohibits agreements, decisions by association of undertaking or concerted practices which have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition within  Singapore. Many rounds of meetings and discussions took place between IEA and the Competition Commission of Singapore over the period of the year with reference to the IEA Guidelines, the1974 Government Gazette and the rationale for IEA’s introduction of the IEA Professional Fee Guidelines in 1999 and the amendments thereafter. IEA has always maintained that the Guidelines are non-binding and that real estate agents are free to negotiate fees with their customers. Real estate agents in Singapore are not regulated. On 25th June 2008, IEA has been advised by the Competition Commission of Singapore (CCS) to remove all elements of fee recommendations and recommendations on fee structures from the Guidelines and any reference to the same in materials that it provides to its members and to the public such that the Guidelines are compliant with the Act. The CCS noted that IEA in its submission had stated that the IEA Guideline is widely accepted and in practice in the industry today but find it to be the de facto industry standard. IEA has been advised to take the necessary steps to inform our Members, the industry and the public on the abolishment of the Guidelines and relevant materials within three (3) months of the date of issuance of the Guidance. i.e. by 25th September 2008. The CCS is of the view that the Guideline is harmful to competition, restricting competition in both fee levels and fee structure in the real estate industry and likely to have the object of appreciably restricting competition among real estate agents in the real estate agency market AND that it is IEA’s desire to set industry standard applicable to estate agents and agencies and it affects competition because it enables all participants to predict with a reasonable degree of    uncertainty what the pricing policy pursued by their competitors will be. IEA’s point of view is that we have to comply though we have highlighted to the Competition Commission of Singapore that IEA may not be agreeable to their guidance or assessment which  are consistent with decisions by established foreign competition authorities, where the real estate agents are regulated but unlike those in the Singapore who are yet to be regulated. IEA will be removing the IEA Professional Fee Guidelines and would not advise, encourage or facilitate any discussions, agreements or arrangements on fees amongst IEA members or industry players. We encourage our members and industry players to set their own professional  fees/ commission rates and services that they will provide to their customers. In view of CCS guidance and the removal of the IEA Professional Fees Guidelines, our advice  to customers is to do your own due diligence when engaging your next real estate agent AND if   you want to choose a professional real estate agent, choose one who is a member of IEA. At least, you will have peace of mind and an avenue for redress if necessary. IEA maintains that the rationale for the introduction of the Guidelines is meant for better uniformity in fees and as an accepted and approved standard for real estate agents’  remunerations for transactions and to keep the customers informed and avoid over charging.  IEA’s 10 year old Professional Fee Guidelines being what it is, is not binding but merely as a point of reference in the real estate industry. IEA would like to take this opportunity to encourage consumers to engage agents who are members of IEA. Members of IEA adhere to a strict Code of Conduct & Ethics and IEA has a Mediation Board & Disciplinary Board to address any complaints from consumers. Members of IEA are also encourage to subscribe to Professional Indemnity Insurance (P.I) to protect the interests of consumers.     

꼭 필요한 질문, 정성스런 답변 부탁드립니다!

Q

NO.45

기타PR받은 후 한국 부동산 양도세 면제 받으신분 계신가요…

  • 답글 : 1
  • 댓글 : 1
답변진행중
네식구(emaappssman) 2008-10-25
추천수 : 36 조회수 : 1,269

안녕하세요. 이곳에 거주하다가 영주권을 받는 경우는 해외이주가 아니라 현지이주 라고 하더군요. 해외이주의 경우 국내에서 해당국가의 이주허가통지서를 받은 후 외교통상부에 신고후 해외이주신고 확인서를 받아서 국내 부동산을 비과세로 처분할수 있는 자격이 1년동안 생기는 건…

  • A

    해외이주 상태이면, 영주권 (PR) 여부에 상관 없이도 양도세 비과세됩니다. 단, 지난 달까지는 6억이하에 해당되는 매매 금액에 대해서만 비과세 되었는데, 지금은 9억이하로 변경되었으므로 9억 이하의 매매금액의 경우 비과세일 것으로 생각됩니다. 그럼으로, 매매 금액이 9억 이상인 경우는, 9억까지는 해외이주로 인한 비과세 해당됨으로 9억 이상의 금액에 대한 양도세 (40%)만 납부하면 되는 것이지요. >안녕하세요. >이곳에 거주하다가 영주권을 받는 경우는 해외이주가 아니라 현지이주 라고 하더군요. > >해외이주의 경우 국내에서 해당국가의 이주허가통지서를 받은 후 외교통상부에 신고후 해외이주신고 확인서를 받아서 국내 부동산을 비과세로 처분할수 있는 자격이 1년동안 생기는 건데요.. > >현지이주자의 경우 현지에 일반여권으로 출국하다 pr을 받아 거주여권을 대사관에서 받고 외교통상부에 신청하면 현지이주확인서를 발급한다고 되어 있네요. > >싱가폴에서 pr 받으신 분들은 모두 현지이주에 해당할것 같은데요(이민이란건 없으니까요), 이렇게 해서 국내 3년보유가 안된 주택을 매매하고 양도세 비과세 특례조항을 적용받으신 사례가 있으신가요? > >감사합니다.     

    1

가장 많이 본 뉴스

  • ~

서비스이용약관

닫기

개인정보취급방침

닫기

이메일무단수집거부

닫기
닫기
닫기